Music is used very effectively in the movie, and was used in the right spots. Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.
The book was written by John Steinbeck, and the movie was directed by Gary Sinise also stars as George. Significantly, Steinbeck begins and ends the novel at the campsite. I think both the book and the movie had their flaws. The book starts with Lennie and George travelling towards the ranch, after the incident with Lennie and the girl in the red dress in Weed has already happened, but the movie starts with Lennie and George running away from other guys in Weed, who were chasing them because Lennie has scared the girl in the red dress.
It represents, as the ensuing dialogue makes clear, a safe haven—a place where both humans and beasts can retreat should danger threaten. Close ups can be effective when the actor is silently thinking. To underscore the situation, Steinbeck adopts restricted third-person narration and employs a tone that can best be described as uninvolved.
I think it was made shorter to add an element of surprise to the shooting, but by shortening this it makes it so that it lacks the suspense and emotion that was originally in the book, so I think they should have kept it in the movie.
She is a woman who, despite her own dreams of grandeur, finds herself living on a ranch where she is perceived as a threat and an enemy by all the hired hands.
Another example is how long it takes for George to shoot Lennie. More essays like this: I think this was taken out because it was a very emotional and suspenseful scene, and it would have made it comical to put it in, which would have ruined the mood.
It is lush and green and inhabited by all varieties of wild creatures. These are only spoken about in the book, and I think are actually put in the movie to create less dialogue and more action.
The book took a while to get into the story, but the movie lacked certain times of suspense or emotion. They have a dream, to have a little place all to themselves, without anyone bothering them.
These traits, combined with his uncontrollable strength, set the stage for disaster. The ranch, as he describes it, is a world without love and in which friendship is viewed as remarkable.
I think this is symbolic of the need to escape, which Lennie does. Although they bunk together and play an occasional game of cards or horseshoes, each is wary of his peers. Silence was also very effective, especially after George had shot Lennie.
For this reason, he begins each chapter with a compendium of details that allows readers to envision the scenes much as they might were they watching a staged presentation.
When the reader first encounters Lennie and George, they are setting up camp in an idyllic grove near the Gabilan mountains. This circular development reinforces the sense of inevitability that informs the entire novel.
George is the small, quick-witted one, and Lennie is the big, slow, dumb and extremely strong one. Instead, he will be reduced to the status of a lonely drifter, seeking earthly pleasures to alleviate the moral isolation and helplessness that Steinbeck suggests is part of the human condition.
It gave the effect of shock and sadness. During the work scenes, the music was medium paced, and happy. One example of this is when Lennie has the hallucinations about the giant rabbit and his Aunt Clara.
Some scenes and details were also left out of the movie that were in the book.
Just as Lennie is destined to get into trouble and be forced to return to the campsite so, too, will George be forced to abandon the dream of owning his own farm. This setting provides author John Steinbeck with a context against which to portray the ranch to which George and Lennie travel the next day.
When George and Lennie were escaping from Weed, the music was faster paced, and suspenseful. Once he has outlined the surroundings, however, he steps away and relies on dialogue to carry the main thread of the story.
Lennie Small, by far the better worker of the two, suffers not only from limited intelligence but also from an overwhelming desire to caress soft objects.
George and Lennie are men who travel around working at ranches.
Steinbeck frames the desolation of ranch life by having George and Lennie comment on how different their lives are and having the other ranch hands comment on how unusual it is for two men to travel together. I will be comparing the movie and book, to see the differences and how effective they are.
Another effective thing used in this movie is camera shots and angles.Of Mice and Men – A Comparison Between the Book and Film Essay Sample. The name of this book/movie is ‘Of Mice and Men’. The book was written by John Steinbeck, and the movie was directed by Gary Sinise (also stars as George).
Compare and Contrast Of Mice and Men Movie and Book The classic novel, Of Mice and Men, written by John Steinbeck was made into a Hollywood Blockbuster in Directed and acted by Gary Sinise and John Malkovich, Hollywood took a stab at trying to recreate this literary success.
Of mice and men ending When the men paraded across the barnyard with their prize, their trophy, Lennie, George could not watch.
It was hard for George to see his best friend, his only true companion to be bound like a dead animal and paraded around. The Significance of the Opening in Of Mice and Men The novel opening is scene setting; Steinbeck wrote it with lots of descriptive words with many colour words, "yellow sands" and "white, recumbent limbs.".
The opening scene in of Mice and Men is happy and peaceful compared to the closing scenes. Before the entry of the two main characters, Steinbeck gets the audience involved by describing the idyllic setting: the beautiful, colorful, peaceful and poetic evening in.
Of Mice and Men recounts the story of two itinerant ranch hands who, despite their apparent differences, are dependent on each other. Lennie Small, by far the better worker of the two, suffers not.Download