A study of methane

Top down emissions estimates do not use direct source measurements and typically result in larger emissions estimates than bottom-up approaches.

However, the study also found significant variation by region, with some areas showing higher than average emissions. We made a total of measurements of underground pipeline leaks and measurements at metering and regulating facilities, which is twice as many direct measurements as previous studies.

It is reasonable to expect that the age of the infrastructure and climatic differences can explain the regional differences. What are EPA estimates for the amount of methane leaking from distribution pipelines in the United States? Natural gas, which is mostly methane, produces less carbon dioxide than oil or coal.

Compared to other hydrocarbon fuelsmethane produces less carbon dioxide for each unit of heat released. That number is 63 percent higher than the 1. Chameides, and Steven P.

Understanding a New Study on Oil and Gas Methane Emissions

But natural gas is mostly methane, and methane leaks out of wells, pipelines, and storage tanks. The results are concerning because methane is a potent greenhouse gas that has more of a warming effect in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide, part for part.

If you used data from this study how if at all would overall leakage change in these other two inventories? Why is WSU leading this project?

At the same time, the study also provides the strongest evidence to date that switching from coal to natural gas in the power sector produces climate benefits over all time frames.

Recent Research In recent years, hundreds of researchers have taken on this topic and published dozens of studies, many of which have been coordinated by the Environmental Defense Fund EDFwhich deserves praise for focusing attention and gathering evidence on the topic of methane emissions.

Top-down methods measure methane concentrations in the air and try to determine how much methane must be emitted to produce this concentration.

Robinson, and Albert A. Both methods are valid and provide valuable information, and both methods have drawbacks.

Study: Methane emissions cancel near-term climate benefits of natural gas

Notably, the study omits several major producing regions, including the Permian basin and Eagle Ford shale, highlighting the ever-present need for more data collection. To do that requires combining emission factors from this study with EPA activity factors e g.

Because of significant technological advancements, the natural gas industry is growing dramatically. Additionally, the national data from this study confirms there are regional differences across the country in local distribution systems, so it is not surprising to see some places with higher emissions than other places.

Minority opposition to the solution Methane leaks and venting in the oil and gas industry have been a concern for years. Methane is abundant in many parts of the Solar system and potentially could be harvested on the surface of another solar-system body in particular, using methane production from local materials found on Mars [29] or Titanproviding fuel for a return journey.

However, the Boston study measured all fugitive methane emissions in the region, including transmission pipelines, compression stations, storage facilities, and vehicles, as well as those associated with commercial, industrial, and home end-users which are not well understood, not just those from natural gas distribution pipelines.

Over a year time frame, methane is 86 times more potent as a heat-trapping greenhouse gas than CO2. It is initiated when UV light or some other radical initiator produces a halogen atom.

In many cities, methane is piped into homes for domestic heating and cooking. In the s, the method involved digging down, isolating pipe, and measuring the gas flow rate required to keep the pipe pressurized; this flow rate was then taken as the leak rate from the buried pipe.

Richardson, Yanni Cao, et al. The locations and methods involved in recent methane emission studies vary. For example, he cited some of the storage tanks holding liquids at gas sites.

Study: Methane emissions much higher than EPA says

This creates a difficult situation: The new paper marks the culmination of seven years of work by academic researchers, oil and gas companies, and the Environmental Defense Fund, which have collectively been trying to gather better, more comprehensive data on methane emissions.

Sources listed at the end of this blog post. How do your methods differ from previous efforts to take these measurements? At that time, pipeline leaks were measured by individual companies using a standard method on pipeline sections scheduled for repair.

EPA issues its inventory of greenhouse gas emissions every year and in addition to providing a new year of data, updates emission estimates from previous years using improved data and methods. The new study incorporates bottom-up measurements from nine producing regions the Arkoma, Bakken, Barnett, Denver-Julesburg, Fayetteville, Haynesville, Marcellus, San Juan, and Uintah regions then validates those results using top-down data from the same areas.

Some top-down studies have focused on gas and oil production basins, while others have been in large urban areas, such as Boston or Los Angeles.One study reported that the livestock sector in general (primarily cattle, chickens, and pigs) produces 37% of all human-induced methane.

Early research has found a number of medical treatments and dietary adjustments that help slightly limit the production of methane in ruminants. ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Methane emissions from domestic oil and gas operations may be 60 percent higher than current Environmental Protection Agency estimates, according to a new study published.

Methane is the primary component of natural gas – a common fuel source. Why are we concerned about it? If methane is allowed to leak into the air before being used—from a leaky pipe, for instance—it absorbs the sun's heat, warming the atmosphere.

For this reason, it's considered a greenhouse. The US has been dramatically underestimating methane emissions from oil and gas operations, according to a new study published in Science on Thursday.

Study: US oil and gas methane emissions have been dramatically underestimated

The study, conducted by the Environmental. Another study partially funded by EDF was published earlier this year and estimated that methane leakage rates in Boston, which includes downstream components of the natural gas system, including transmission, distribution, and end use are % higher than data from the most closely comparable emission inventory for the Boston area.

The amount of methane leaking from the nation's oil and gas fields may be 60 percent higher than the official estimates of the Environmental Protection Agency, according to a new study in the.

A study of methane
Rated 3/5 based on 16 review